Politics
Why BJP’s ‘Infiltration’ And ‘UCC’ Tactics Tanked In Jharkhand Elections
Last Updated:
According to senior BJP leaders in Jharkhand, sections of the ‘Christian-dominated and converted tribal population’ influenced the elections to a great extent, while the party’s decision not to project an Adivasi as the chief ministerial face also cost it dearly
JMM and Congress workers celebrate INDIA bloc’s decisive lead amid the counting of votes for the Jharkhand assembly elections, at the JMM office, in Ranchi on November 23. (Image: PTI)
Announcement of a proposed Uniform Civil Code (UCC) followed by an anti-infiltration pitch—the Bharatiya Janata Party’s hardline narratives failed to resonate with the tribal voters of Jharkhand in this month’s assembly elections as results were announced on Saturday.
According to senior BJP leaders in Jharkhand, sections of the “Christian-dominated and converted tribal population” influenced the elections to a great extent, while the party’s decision not to project an Adivasi as the chief ministerial face also cost it dearly.
The combination of a proposed UCC and an anti-infiltration stand made the tribal voters jittery, said observers. As the results trickle in, of the 28 Scheduled Tribe seats in the state, the BJP is leading in six to seven, while the rest are likely to go to the INDIA bloc parties, primarily to the ruling Jharkhand Mukti Morcha. In 2019, the BJP won only two ST seats, while JMM bagged 21 and the rest went to its allies.
The results reflect how the BJP-RSS combine is still struggling to make headway among its erstwhile tribal support base, as the saffron party’s policies are making the tribal population feel more alienated in the region, observers said. Despite choosing a tribal face as the chief minister in Odisha a few months ago, the political strategy failed to strike a chord among the Adivasi population in Jharkhand.
Anti-infiltration pitch bombed
The state’s tribal population, which dominates at least 28 seats while playing a decisive role in at least half a dozen others, has always been deeply rooted in cultural and customary practices. They reacted warily to the BJP’s UCC pitch, viewing it as a threat to their traditional rights, the results indicate.
“Factors such as the announcement of the UCC, which created unease among the state’s tribal communities, especially the Christian tribals, the lack of a compelling tribal leadership post-Babulal Marandi and Arjun Munda’s declining influence, and the inability to present infiltration as a macro-level threat played against us,” said a senior BJP leader on condition of anonymity.
This fear overshadowed the BJP’s emphasis on issues like infiltration, which failed to connect with the voters at a local level. Unlike in West Bengal or Assam, where infiltration has been perceived as a tangible demographic and socio-economic issue, Jharkhand’s electorate did not see it as a pressing concern, especially in the absence of visible impacts in tribal-dominated regions.
“Our pre-election ground-level surveys hinted at such things and we communicated this to our central leadership. The selection of candidates in some places also created a huge furore,” the BJP leader added.
Leadership vacuum
Adding to the BJP’s challenges was the absence of a strong and charismatic tribal face to counter the Hemant Soren-led alliance. Arjun Munda, or Babulal Marandi, once stalwart leaders for tribal representation within the BJP, seemed to have lost their appeal across key regions, leaving a leadership vacuum.
Sympathy for chief minister Hemant Soren following his arrest and other corruption probes coupled with factional attacks further consolidated the tribal vote against the BJP, said the leader.
Last Updated:
Shiv Sena MLA Nilesh Rane said Hindu community just has one country – India. Nepal is also a Hindu majority country, but number of community members is very less in Himalayan nation.
Prime Minister Narendra Modi (PTI Image)
Shiv Sena MLA Nilesh Rane on Tuesday claimed India will save Hindus in Bangladesh, where they are facing attacks, and Prime Minister Narendra Modi can defeat the neighbouring nation in “48 hours”.
Speaking at a rally organised in Sindhudurg district of Maharashtra to protest against atrocities on minority Hindus in Bangladesh, Rane said India is being surrounded by all sides everyday.
He said the Hindu community just has one country – India. Nepal is also a Hindu majority country, but the number of community members is very less in the Himalayan nation.
“Muslims have many countries. If you (Muslims) do not like our country then leave,” the ruling coalition MLA maintained.
Hindu women are being kidnapped and stones are being pelted on Ganpati, Ram Navmi and Hanuman Jayanti rallies/processions in Maharashtra, alleged the MLA whose party is aligned with the BJP.
“We will save Hindus in Bangladesh. There is (PM) Narendra Modi for that. But it is our responsibility to save our country. Do not let your guard down. Modi ji will not take more than two days to defeat Bangladesh. We will defeat Bangladesh in 48 hours,” the Shiv Sena legislator told the gathering in his home district.
Nilesh Rane is son of former Maharashtra chief minister Narayan Rane and elder brother of BJP MLA Nitesh Rane, who has been accused of make provocative speeches.
Nilesh Rane, a former BJP member, joined the Shiv Sena led by deputy CM Eknath Shinde ahead of the last month’s assembly polls and won from Kudal in Sindhudurg district.
Meanwhile, in Thane district, the Sakal Hindu Samaj, on the occasion of World Human Rights Day, organized an event to highlight atrocities against Hindus in Bangladesh and express solidarity with them.
A delegation representing the organization met with Thane district collector Ashok Shingare and Police Commissioner Ashutosh Dhumbre, and submitted a memorandum outlining their concerns and demands.
The memorandum brought attention to the “inhumane treatment and violence faced by Hindus in Bangladesh,” and urged the Indian government to take “swift and decisive action” to address the crisis.
To amplify their message, the Sakal Hindu Samaj organized a “silent march” in Thane on Sunday, as part of the “Bangladesh Hindu Nyaya Yatra” (Bangladesh Hindu Justice March).
The campaign also extended to Vasai in Palghar district, where hundreds of citizens took part in the yatra. The march was led by BJP leader Mahendra Patil.
(This story has not been edited by News18 staff and is published from a syndicated news agency feed – PTI)
- Location :
Sindhudurg, India
Last Updated:
The decision to approach the Supreme Court against the Election Commission was announced by Prashant Jagtap, leader of the NCP-Sharad Pawar who lost the assembly elections from the Hadapsar seat in Pune
During the meeting, Kejriwal flagged concerns related to voter lists in Delhi where assembly elections are due early next year.
(File Photo)
The opposition INDIA bloc in Maharashtra is set to move the Supreme Court over alleged manipulation of EVMs in the recent assembly elections.
The decision to approach the Supreme Court against the Election Commission was announced by Prashant Jagtap, leader of the NCP-Sharad Pawar who lost the assembly elections from the Hadapsar seat in Pune.
The decision was announced after a meeting between NCP-SP chief Sharad Pawar, AAP convenor Arvind Kejriwal and noted lawyer and Congress leader Abhishek Singhvi here.
Pawar has been meeting leaders of his party who lost the assembly elections.
The INDIA bloc has claimed that it lost the elections in Maharashtra due to alleged manipulation of EVMs in favour of the BJP-led Mahayuti coalition.
In the elections held last month, the BJP-led Mahayuti coalition won 235 seats in the 288-member House while the opposition Maha Vikas Aghadi (MVA) alliance bagged 46.
During the meeting, Kejriwal flagged concerns related to voter lists in Delhi where assembly elections are due early next year.
(This story has not been edited by News18 staff and is published from a syndicated news agency feed – PTI)
Last Updated:
Opposition’s motion of removal against Jagdeep Dhankhar: The notice, as per article 67(B) of the Constitution, will have to be put to vote first in the Rajya Sabha and, if needed, later in the Lok Sabha
Jagdeep Dhankhar has become the first Vice-President in the history of Independent India to face such a motion for removal. (PTI File)
A total of 60 MPs from opposition parties have submitted a notice to the Rajya Sabha Secretary General, demanding a motion for removal of Rajya Sabha chairman and Vice-President Jagdeep Dhankhar
The MPs from the Congress, Trinamool Congress (TMC), Samajwadi Party (SP), Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam (DMK) and other INDIA bloc allies have alleged that Dhankhar’s conduct is biased and therefore unbecoming of his position as the chairperson of the Rajya Sabha.
Article 67(b) of the Constitution of India states that the Vice-President can be removed from office by a resolution of the council of states. The resolution must be passed by a majority of the council of states and agreed to by the House of the People. Before a resolution can be moved, at least 14 days’ notice must be given of the intention to move the resolution.
For the first time in the 72-year history of the Rajya Sabha, Opposition Parties have formally submitted a no-confidence motion against the Chairman.There have been three occasions, however, when a no-confidence motion has been moved against the Speaker of the Lok Sabha. pic.twitter.com/DHjo5vqL2K
— Jairam Ramesh (@Jairam_Ramesh) December 10, 2024
WHAT NEXT?
The notice, as per article 67(B) of the Constitution, will have to be put to vote first in the Rajya Sabha and, if needed, later in the Lok Sabha.
Constitutional expert P D T Achari told News18 that the Rajya Sabha rule book makes no mention of any provision for removal of the chairperson. However, article 67 of the Constitution provides for the procedure for impeachment of the Vice-President of India. “The motion moved by the opposition will have to be put to vote in the Rajya Sabha. If a majority votes in favour, then it will be sent to the Lok Sabha. The Vice-President can be removed only if a majority of members in both the houses vote to impeach him,” Achary said.
#WATCH | On Opposition’s no-confidence motion against Rajya Sabha Chairman Jagdeep Dhankhar, Congress MP Jairam Ramesh says, ” In the last 72 years, it is the first time that Opposition parties have submitted a motion over Rajya Sabha Chairman. This shows how the situation has… pic.twitter.com/ySiO4r8D7u— ANI (@ANI) December 10, 2024
GOVERNMENT’S STAND
Parliamentary affairs minister Kiren Rijiju condemned the move by the INDIA bloc, but said the government did not have a problem in accepting the notice and getting it voted upon. Rijiju, however, pointed out that the National Democratic Alliance (NDA) enjoys a majority in Parliament and all NDA MPs have full faith in the chairperson. “This notice is a diversionary tactic because the Congress is scared and disturbed over the Soros revelation. Dhankhar is a Jat, son of a farmer. We condemn this move to target him,” Rijiju said.
14 DAYS REQUIREMENT
As per article 67, a 14-day notice must be given before any resolution to remove the Vice-President is voted upon. Achari clarified that although this is an unprecedented situation, a bare reading of the Constitution suggests that the resolution moved by the opposition can be taken up in the next session of Parliament as less than 10 working days remain in the winter session. “A special session of the two houses can be called or the notice can be voted upon in the next session,” he told News18.
UNPRECEDENTED MOVE
Dhankhar has become the first Vice-President in the history of Independent India to face such a motion for removal. The numbers in both the Rajya Sabha and Lok Sabha favour the ruling side, but the opposition insists on “putting on record the bias of the Chair”.
“As Chairperson, the manner in which Shri Jagdeep Dhankhar conducts parliamentary affairs of the Rajya Sabha is extremely partisan. It is a matter of record that Shri Jagdeep Dhankhar has repeatedly interrupted members of the Opposition while they are speaking, unfairly used privilege motions to silence leaders of the opposition, and openly delegitimized dissent with respect to the actions of the Government in the utmost disparaging manner,” the notice alleges.
It adds that his open praise for the Rashtriya Swayamsevak Sangh (RSS) and calling himself an “Ekalavya of the RSS” is proof of his bias. Rijiju dismissed the charge and said there was nothing wrong with praising an organisation like the RSS.
YouTube’s new auto-dubbing feature is now available for knowledge-focused content
Pepeto ICO Hits $2 Million Milestone, Showcasing Strong Community Support
Mikel Arteta Grapples With Arsenal’s Defensive Injury Crisis Ahead Of Monaco Game
‘Status Symbol’: As Splinter Faction Claims to Be ‘Real JD(S)’, Is Party Headed Shiv Sena, AIADMK, NCP Way?
Prime Minister Narendra Modi To Launch Projects Worth ₹21,500 crore In Poll Bound Telangana | News18
Google Chrome Launches A New AI Tool Named ‘Help Me Write’
-
Politics12 months ago‘Status Symbol’: As Splinter Faction Claims to Be ‘Real JD(S)’, Is Party Headed Shiv Sena, AIADMK, NCP Way?
-
Politics1 year agoPrime Minister Narendra Modi To Launch Projects Worth ₹21,500 crore In Poll Bound Telangana | News18
-
Press Release1 year agoGoogle Chrome Launches A New AI Tool Named ‘Help Me Write’
-
Cryptocurrency1 year agoRecent Funding Rounds for Crypto Projects & Companies on October 19th💼🚀
-
Tech1 year agoAndreessen Horowitz backs Civitai, a generative AI content marketplace with millions of users
-
Tech1 year agoCharacter.AI introduces group chats where people and multiple AIs can talk to each other
-
Cryptocurrency1 year agoRecent Funding Rounds for Crypto Projects & Companies on Oct 18th🚀💰
-
Entertainment7 months agoWhy Brenda Edwards is wearing an eye patch on Loose Women